Archive for the ‘linkedin’ Category

Because, unlike some other Robin Hoods, I can speak with an English accent.

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

robin hood
The trailer for Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood (2010) took the internet by storm today. Everyone is talking about the costumes, the leading couple (played by Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett), and the giant explosions that leave the trailer (here) barely coherent. We are left to guess whether Russell Crowe can even do a real British accent. As for Blanchett – the back of her head looks very nice. Maybe in the next teaser we’ll actually get to see more of her face.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. The truth is, I’m actually kind of excited about this movie. I’ve been a fan of the Robin Hood mythology since I was old enough to sneak attack the good for nothing nobility (read: the family pets) for trespassing through Sherwood forest (read: the living room).

I have always wished for a Robin Hood film that dared to break the mould and show the raucous, gritty, adventurous side of the legendary figure – none of this theatrical, over-staged nonsense. I may get my wish in Ridley Scott’s brainchild, but the Michael Bay effect of the trailer leaves me slightly skeptical … and slightly dizzy, but that’s probably due to all of the hyper-editing. Seriously, I know we’re trying to be vague, but it would be nice to see something. I guess I’ll have to wait for the rest of the footage the studio is sure to “leak” before this movie hits theaters.

In the meantime, I’ve decided to fill the marauder shaped void in my life by looking back at this capeless crusader’s reign in American cinema.

errol flynnThe Adventures of Robin Hood (1938): No one buckles a swash quite like Errol Flynn. Add Olivia de Havilland and you have one classy tale of knights, swordplay, and petty theft. The duels are very well choreographed and the Sheriff’s minions couldn’t hit a barn at twenty paces, even adjusting for the limited velocity of an arrow. (Somehow, I don’t think that heroes are supposed to be able to out run them.) But the dialogue is campy, the costumes are pre-Weta, and it’s worth every minute.

disneys RHRobin Hood (1973): I think I am one of the few people in the world who loves one this movie. It is one of Disney’s most overlooked gems. Sure, the folk songs are not everyone’s cup of tea, but the comedic chemistry between Robin Hood and Little John is great, and Maid Marian does more than stand there and scream. This movie also gains distinction for being one of the the rare Disney cartoons that doesn’t center around a Princess (but that’s another blog post entirely).

prince of thievesRobin Hood Prince of Thieves (1991): This movie has ruined my ability to watch Severus Snape without bursting into random fits of laughter. Really, Alan Rickman, REALLY!?!?!? I probably shouldn’t beat up on him too much, since he is the best thing this movie has going for itself. Kevin Costner shows the world (like we needed more evidence) that the mullet can only be worn well by Billy Ray Cyrus. His accent is decidedly Yankee and he’s generally better just not talking at all. Not to mention, the “giant” plot twist. I told a friend about this one while we were watching … she thought I was joking … poor, poor, disillusioned woman. Still, it’s a must see if you want to fully appreciate the genius that is the next film on our list.

men in tightsRobin Hood: Men in Tights (1993): Mel Brooks clearly ran out of a Prince of Thieves screening with all of the comedic fodder that he needed for this gem. Carey Ewles is brilliant and he knows it – in a good way. Dave Chapelle hams it up as the Hood’s sidekick, Ahchoo. Three cheers for the Sherriff’s mole and Marion’s chastity belt!

shrek
Shrek
(2001): The scene isn’t long and Robin Hood is French, but … he gets the crap kicked out of him by Cameron Diaz. That along makes this movie worth watching.

-Stephanie

*The post has been edited. Thanks Harmony for catching the error. :-)

Step aside ickle children, Harry’s a big boy now

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

deathly hallows
The first teaser trailer for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 1 hit the net on Monday to much excited clapping from at least this fan. But my reaction was slightly less enthusiastic when I heard director David Yates’ comments about his vision for the new films.

According to Yates, the upcoming movie (which will cover the first half of Deathly Hallows) will be different from anything we have already seen in the series. Because the Golden Trio is running from the Death Eaters in muggle England, this film will be grittier and less fanciful than its predecessors. I’m all for bringing greater gravity to this chapter in the story by adding more realism. This is the beginning of the final battle and that should give the audience a taste for the reality of the fight.

What has the internet hopping and me concerned, however, is a different revelation from Mr. Yates. Apparently this movie will feature a nude sex scene between Harry and Hermione. Yes, you read that correctly. Harry and Hermione are getting it on in the next film adaption of this children’s book series.

HP fans may wonder where this scene was in the final novel. Hint: it wasn’t. Unless Yates got his own special “adult” copy.

I guess this is Yates’ way of letting all of the series’ prepubescent fans know that Harry’s a big boy now.

Read the article here.

Shakespeare on the Silver Screen

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

It’s finally here as I promised, the best film adaptions of Shakespeare’s classic plays. After wading through many, many horrific hours of poor translations and cheesy acting, I have narrowed down the list to five. So here they are, in no particular order, the best of Shakespeare:

night's dream A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1999): Every movie needs a gimmick. For some it’s brilliant method acting; for others it’s a random child painted like Vishnu. This adaption of the classic comedy features some interesting modernizations like Kevin Kline, period 1800s costumes, and a random bike chase … on foot. But the dialogue is well rendered and stay’s true to Shakespeare’s work. The scenery is beautiful. The characters are endearing. You will laugh until your sides ache.

Hamlet
Hamlet
(1996): Nothing rounds out the perfect date night like watching a family self-destruct violently. To you it’s a tragedy, to the residents of Elsinore Castle it’s just another day with the family. Kenneth Branagh’s production of Hamlet is a visual masterpiece that draws the viewer into court life. This film is a must see for over-emotional aristocrats everywhere.

merchant of venice
The Merchant of Venice
(2004): If you prick me will I not bleed? If you tickle me, will I not laugh? If you make me watch a different version of this film, will I not cry? Al Pacino brings genuine sympathy to his role as Shylock. While Jeremy Irons evokes empathy for Antonio’s plight and scorn for his general wimpiness. The true star is Lynn Collins as Portia, the woman who uses her education and flair for men’s fashion to win back her man and prove why the pixie cut doesn’t look good on anyone. This movie is definitely worth a whole barrel of monkeys.

Romeo and Juliet
Romeo and Juliet
(1968): For those unfortunate ones of my generation who have not experienced the acting chops of Olivia Hussey, run don’t walk to your nearest movie rental facility. This girl’s portrayal of Juliet is emotional, irrational, and spot on. The costumes won an academy award and the film was nominated for best picture. Small children beware, Romeo’s derriere gets some good screen time.

taming of the shrew
The Taming of the Shrew
(1967): The leading lady of this film adaption is also relatively unknown to members of my generation who most commonly think of her as “that lady with the perfume commercials.” But before she sold cosmetics, Elizabeth Taylor pushed burly men down stairs and wore dresses that made Joseph and all of his technicolors jealous. Richard Burton acts as a worthy, though he be bearded, foil to her scheming. The chemistry between the two is fiery and the result is some great humor.

Honorable Mention: moonlighting
Moonlighting: Atomic Shakespeare
(1986) This episode aired during season 3 of the popular 1980s detective show. It is recorded entirely in iambic pentameter … or … at least it rhymes a lot. Bruce Willis and Cybil Shephard give a modern treatment to the classic Taming of the Shrew that involves a horse wearing sunglasses, a sun that isn’t, ninjas, and a wedding rock band. You’ll never look at Shakespeare the same way again.

-Stephanie

Twilight in Love

Saturday, November 21st, 2009


New Moon is a watered-down version of Romeo and Juliet with more angst and less purpose. There’s no point in denying it. In fact, Stephanie Meyer alludes quite frequently to the lovers of classical literature in the Twilight series. Romeo and JulietTwilight

Twilight refers to Pride and Prejudice. Eclipse reveals the Heathcliff in Edward and the Cathy in Bella. Breaking Dawn is… Alien – so, okay, Stephanie Meyer broke her pattern with that one. But at least she offers a nod to The Merchant of Venice and A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

With New Moon in theaters, I’ve decided to hide away from the hordes of squeeing fans and take a peak at the Romeo and Juliet in this Twilight sequel. (Dr. Tubbs, this one’s for you.) Romeo and Juliet is a love story for the ages. It’s origins go back to the ancient Greeks and Romans, because, let’s face it, we all love a good tragedy. Nothing makes a story live forever quite like a premature death and a priest who moonlights as a pharmacist. spelling bee But Romeo and Juliet were facing some pretty great obstacles in their relationship: their fathers were gangsters, the Prince was a pratt, and Verona wasn’t known for breaking into spontaneous song – a phenomenon that would have eased tensions considerably. I mean, come on, who’s pulling a sword in the middle of the 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee?

Similarly, Bella and Edward are facing some challenges. He’s a vampire and she’s not. Okay, make that one challenge. Still they are in love, they’re young, and they’re too emo for their own good. The book and the movie revolve around the classic he said, she said. He crushes a phone; she dives off a cliff. Someone is dead and all hell breaks loose. True love at its finest.

Shakespeare pulls no punches with his young couple – two beats before seeing Juliet, Romeo is mooning over another girl! Yeah, that’s a love for the ages! Finicky, selfish, young, irresponsible, lust-driven, obsessive love in a relationship that lasts for a few days before Juliet’s boy toy kills her cousin. It wasn’t his fault? Fine. But he agreed to fight, the guy died, and he’s sent into exile. Juliet, like a good little fourteen-year-old, throws a tantrum. Then Romeo imbibes some punch, and the rest is literary history.

What Meyer forgets is the classic tale doesn’t die with a kiss. The poncy Prince doesn’t get to say much, but what he says is important. R and J book
The thwarting of a great love is not the tragedy.  The real grief and power in the story comes from two families who have traded their children for a vendetta. The town is littered with their dead. Romeo’s mother has offed herself due to the grief of her loss. People are killing each other in the streets, and now the fathers have killed their own children. Romeo and Juliet’s deaths are significant because they brought the cost of the war home. The book is a political and social statement told through a love story – a tactic Shakespeare used in most of his work.

That is what gives Romeo and Juliet’s teeny-bopper relationship such power. Would we really have liked them if we’d had to watch that relationship develop over four books as we have with this sparkly vamp and his girl? Would we even like  Ed and B if we saw them 40 years into their relationship? I’m not so sure.

New moon book
Stephanie Meyers isn’t trying to make an eternal statement, she’s telling the story of two teenagers (apparently 109 is the new 17) in crazy, erratic, suicidal love with each other. She’s done so with flourish and aplomb. But at its best, her work contains only a shadow of the greater story that she works so hard to mimic. In that brief flicker of similarity there lies a danger to those who cannot tell the difference between a teen romance and a true “in sickness and in health” kind of love.

Meyer’s characters, like Romeo and Juliet, are still children in how they view commitment. They don’t have to consider the possibility of regret or the work that goes into building a real relationship.

Meyer’s fans look at Romeo and Juliet as far off characters who wear weird clothes and speak like the Queen.  But Bella and Edward go to high school and listen to Linkin Park.

Or as the girl sitting next to me in the theater gushed, “That is love.”  But is it? And, what happens when the impressionable members of Team Edward and Team Jacob are unable to tell the difference?

-Stephanie

fans



Sometimes watching is as good as reading…

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

Your teacher always told you that watching the movie was never as good as reading the book. That’s true most of the time, but sometimes Hollywood comes pretty freaking close to the written word. That is why I’ve compiled the 10 best books converted into movies. Before you send me hastily written scribbles asking why Shakespeare is not represented on this list of epic achievement, the answer is: Shakespeare deserves his own list.  So without further ado:

Jane Eyre
1. Jane Eyre (2006): I will always remember this movie as being the film during which a dear friend of mine turned to me and said, “If a vampire jumps out and eats [Jane Eyre], I’ll kill you.”  If that doesn’t get you curious, nothing will. This movie perfectly captures the gothic, windswept atmosphere of Thornfield Hall and its crotchety owner Edward Rochester. My only quibble is that the burns are not quite bad enough, but are easily overlooked given the obvious chemistry between Jane and Rochester that was so sorely lacking in all previous silver screen adaptations.

Pride and prejudice2. Pride and Prejudice (1995): I couldn’t create this top 10 list without including this film starring Jennifer Ehle and Collin Firth as the illustrious leads.  No film based upon Jane Austen’s most popular book has so captured the feel of her subtle wit quite like this series. Mrs. Bennett’s nerves and Mr. Darcy’s sexy pond scene make this a fun film for all.

Schindler's List3. Schindler’s List(1993): I had no idea that Steven Spielberg’s Oscar winning film was based on a book until I stumbled upon a well-worn copy in a dark back corner of The Strand bookstore.  I laughed at Schindler’s antics and cried when I learned the little girl in the red coat was not just a metaphor created by Spielberg.  Every difficult and heartwarming page, like the movie, reminds us that this list is life.

Sense4. Sense and Sensibility (1995): The 90s was a good decade for Austen fans. Alan Rickman’s portrayal of Colonel Brandon more than makes up for Hugh Grant’s blundering attempt to be Edward Ferrars.  Add Emma Thompson and Kate Winslet as two sisters struggling with live, love, and corsets and you have a wonderful vacation to aristocratic Britain.

pimpernel
5. The Scarlet Pimpernel
(1982): Rather than simply portraying one book on screen, this film deftly portrays events from all nine books in The Scarlet Pimpernel series.  Made-for-TV in the late 1980s this film features Jane Seymour with an amazing head of hair – you laugh now, but just wait. It also has one of the most overbearing soundtracks that you’ll ever hear. But don’t let that dissuade you, this film is worth every minute thanks to the genius of Anthony Andrews as the hero and Sir Ian McKellan as … well, you’ll just have to watch to find out.

karenina
6. Anna Karenina
(2000): Who knew adultery could end so badly? The book is at least two inches thick; containing however many words are needed to fill a ream of paper. Needless to say, few movie adaptations have been able to capture Tolstoy’s real intentions for his story. Thankfully, Helen McCrory and Kevin McKidd are pretty darn close.  You’ll never look at a train the same way again.

miserables
7. Les Miserables
(1998): Two words: Geoffrey Rush. Two more words: Liam Neeson. Need I say more? Yes. Odds are, if you haven’t braved Anna Karinina, you won’t be attempting to slog through this book. That’s exactly why you need to see this film. Understandably, characters and themes are missing from the 1400 (give or take) page work, but the heart of the story stays true.  The only disappointment is that this version’s ending comes far too soon as compared to the original story arc.

princess
8. The Princess Bride
(1987): What to say about the book that says it all. This book has romance, comedy, swordfights, and hats. The only thing it doesn’t have is the film’s kindly grandfather reading to Fred Savage. Instead we have the “author’s” humor tale of how he got his favorite childhood story published. You will laugh, you will cry. You will wonder why you hadn’t read it sooner.

Ivanhoe
9. Ivanhoe
(1982): Another made-for-TV gem with Anthony Andrews in the starring role. This time he is Ivanhoe the disinherited son of a long line of proud Saxons with bad hair – which he, happily, has also not inherited. He has returned to regain his birthright and (of course) get the girl. Olivia Hussey stars as the lovely Rebecca; John Rhys Davies is a bastard; and Robin Hood gets a cameo. What’s not to love?

Vanity fair
10. Vanity Fair
(2004): Hot damn! Reese Witherspoon heats up this movie with a passion for social climbing that cannot be stopped – even if the roadblocks come in the form of a rouge husband with terrible luck and a son who desperately wants to be loved. Believe it or not this is a kind portrayal of William Thackerey’s tempestuous character – and don’t we all love to hate her.

Honorable Mentions: I know many of you are dying to know why The Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, and The Chronicles of Narnia didn’t make it onto this list. The simple answer is they are above the list. All three are excellent movie series’ that hold well to the originals even as they take liberal artistic license. You should watch and even own all three collections – getting the extended editions where possible.
Lord of the ringsharry potterchronicles